On September 2, 2013,
four members of the 2012-2015 United Thank Offering Board resigned from the
Board, and from their leadership positions, in protest against a process begun
by the Episcopal Church Officers at the Church Center at 815 2nd Avenue to
develop documents of governance for the United Thank Offering Board. Three of these members had been part of
a working group created by the Presiding Bishop to develop these documents
jointly. There were four members
of the United Thank Offering Board, and three members of the staff at 815 and a
representative of the Executive Council. (Three lawyers, and ultimately three
priest; see how that adds up to four—or five!)
When the drafts of these
documents were received, based on the content and the message which accompanied
them, the working group of UTO had an immediate and visceral reaction. The conversations undertaken regarding
the process and the critical points identified by the United Thank Offering group
were not represented in the documents; the four items stated by the UTO
representatives as critical were eliminated completely, and the structure of
UTO changed dramatically. The
message transmitting these documents said:
Attached is our
revisions to the MOU and Bylaws for the UTO Board’s review. We have given this
project significant time and thought and believe that these revisions best
embrace the reality of the UTO Board being an integral and very important part
of DFMS and a CCAB of The Episcopal Church. We also believe that these
revisions will work to maximum the viability of the UTO Board for many years to
come.
Per my
conversation with Robin yesterday, we can convene upon my return to the office
to discuss these revisions at a time suitable to all of us.
This did not to appear to invite restorations to
the revisions of the critical points defined by the UTO working group of the
items defined in the earlier discussions.
The telephone call between the legal counsel of DFMS and the UTO
communication convener did not invite the option of discussing significant
changes; the statement was made,
"We have removed the treasurer position on your board, as the
finance of UTO will now be completely handled by DFMS." The staff at DFMS, including the Presiding
Bishop has repeatedly told the UTO Board that UTO has no money; all the money
belongs to DFMS. Although almost
all of the women of the church know absolutely there is money that belongs to
UTO.
When the
elected members of the board, those immediately affected by the changes, were
given the draft documents to read, all but one of the elected members were
shocked and devastated by the structure the documents established; those on the
working group, and a board member who had been part of the internal
conversations concluded that the evidence put forth by the DFMS office was not
created in good faith, would not be revised in good faith, and resigned in
protest of the new direction forced upon the United Thank Offering by these
documents. The UTO Four, as they
are being called, doubted that, based on their experience with DFMS during the
entire last year, that there would be little integrity in any process.
Other
elected board members decided to stay to try to change the minds of the DFMS
leadership. One continued to
insist that there was nothing wrong with this process at all.
All of the
documents made public from both UTO and DFMS regarding this sad and traumatic
situation are available here. The
list of pages is found to the right; we who resigned have made our joint and
our individual statements. We have
each done this in order to do our best to protect the integrity of the of the
United Thank Offering within the Episcopal Church.
Robin Sumners, UTO Four
Thank you for this summary, Dr. Sumners. I do believe that the best course of action is for the UTO to become an independent 501 (c) (3). I am not alone in this opinion. Indeed, I believe there are many in leadership positions in the church who do not see the status of UTO as being much different from the ER&D. Why it was never seriously entertained by Executive Council and 815 will remain a mystery to me.
ReplyDeletePlease know of my deep admiration of your courage and your witness.
I concur. I think Elizabeth raises a solid, valid response with precedent. This is so sad on so many levels.
DeleteI second my friend and colleague Elizabeth's observation. Independent 501(c)3 status would not only clarify relationships, but also open potentially untapped sources of grateful giving.
ReplyDeleteRobin, count me as the third to support the establishment of an independent 501(c)3 for UTO to continue its wonderful and historic work in cooperation with the Episcopal Church.
ReplyDeleteRobin, thank you for all your work on this. It does seem an independent 501(c)3 best serves the mission and honors the history of UTO.
ReplyDeletePlease give the credit for this hard work to Jim Tinder, Barbi Tinder's devoted spouse. One of my dear friends said that the collateral damage to spouses whose mates are so hurt is huge. Jim has been an integral part of the work of the board, volunteering without resting at times to be sure that things that need to be done are done on time. I don't get any credit for this work; he has done the blog process out of his usual desire to relieve some of the pressure on Barbi and myself. My husband Charlie has done the same things. So give them the credit..
ReplyDeleteRobin Sumners
Thank you, Jim and Charlie.
ReplyDelete